Essay Examples on World of Words Essay Example

Essay Examples on World of Words Paper 1st Essay Sample on World of Words â€Å"The limits of my language mean the limits of my world. † —Ludwig Wittgenstein When we think of communication, we often think about the language used to convey the message. Language and many of our nonverbal behaviors are symbolic. We need to keep in mind that across cultures, symbols do not always mean the same thing and can cause confusion or misunderstanding. The text offers the following example on page 95. â€Å"The arbitrary nature of language becomes obvious-sometimes humorously so-when we discover that our words don’t mean the same thing in another culture.The manufacturer of Dr. Pepper learned this lesson when marketing the soft drink didn’t work in the United Kingdom. There, â€Å"I’m a pepper† means â€Å"I’m a prostitute† (Leaper, 1999). In Chapter 4, the author of the text suggests a set of guidelines for Improving Verbal (with words) Communication, we should: †¢ †¢ Engage in a Dual Perspective— that is, recognize the other’s viewpoint Own Your Thoughts and Feelings— that is, take responsibility for thoughts and feelings rather than blaming others. Use â€Å"I† language rather than â€Å"You† language as seen in the examples in Table 4. We will write a custom essay sample on Essay Examples on World of Words specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Essay Examples on World of Words specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Essay Examples on World of Words specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer . Respect What Others Say About Their Feelings and Thoughts— just as you own your thoughts and feelings, others are doing the same, respecting this allows us to confirm them as people and maintain the dual perspective. World of Words World of Words World of Words Strive for Accuracy and Clarity— because symbols are arbitrary, ambiguous and abstract, we need to find ways to make our communication more accurate and as clear as possible for the situation at hand. Asking questions is a good way to insure accuracy and clarity of messages. 2nd Essay Sample on World of Words â€Å"The limits of my language mean the limits of my world. † —Ludwig Wittgenstein When we think of communication, we often think about the language used to convey the message. Language and many of our nonverbal behaviors are symbolic. We need to keep in mind that across cultures, symbols do not always mean the same thing and can cause confusion or misunderstanding. The text offers the following example on page 95. â€Å"The arbitrary nature of language becomes obvious-sometimes humorously so-when we discover that our words don’t mean the same thing in another culture. The manufacturer of Dr. Pepper learned this lesson when marketing the soft drink didn’t work in the United Kingdom. There, â€Å"I’m a pepper† means â€Å"I’m a prostitute† (Leaper, 1999). In Chapter 4, the author of the text suggests a set of guidelines for Improving Verbal (with words) Communication, we should: †¢ †¢ Engage in a Dual Perspective— that is, recognize the other’s viewpoint Own Your Thoughts and Feelings— that is, take responsibility for thoughts and feelings rather than blaming others. Use â€Å"I† language rather than â€Å"You† language as seen in the examples in Table 4. . Respect What Others Say About Their Feelings and Thoughts— just as you own your thoughts and feelings, others are doing the same, respecting this allows us to confirm them as people and maintain the dual perspective. Strive for Accuracy and Clarity— because symbols are arbitrary, ambiguous and abstract, we need to find ways to make our communication more accurate and as clear as possible for the situation at hand. Asking questions is a good way to insure accuracy and clarity of messages.

Free Essays on Philoshoy

Final Paper People have come to believe that we are morally responsible for our actions. We live in an increasingly violent world; a world that places individual’s responsible for the way in which they live. Our societies have founded governments, justice systems, and social contracts under the premise that people are morally responsible for their actions. Each facet of life seems to carry some sort of rule or law that enforce and asserts responsibility to that person. No mater the amount of rules and laws implemented, humans are unsuccessful in producing a society that is harmonious. A concept that contradicts and raises many questions of harmony is given through a German Philosopher G.W. Liebniz. Leibniz suggests that there is a certain structure to the way we live. He describes life as being a pre-established harmony. According to Leibniz’s theory of a pre-established harmony, humans are not responsible for their actions; instead God arranges everyone’s actions. God has the power to influence the world to his desires and wills, however it leaves humans with little moral responsibility for their actions. The lack of human responsibility is evident throughout Liebniz’s works. If everything happens because God wanted it to take place what explains the violence and destruction that we endure everyday. Through religions we have learned to attribute the success and happiness of an individual as being a work of God. On the other hand, who is responsible for unpleasant and often sad events that take place? Who is morally responsible for the imperfections of the world, God or humans? There cannot be harmony in a world where we cannot determine who retains responsibility for what happens. Traditional views uphold God as the author or cause of everything in the world. God is regarded as the creative source of everything. If all, which exists, is caused and comes into existence by the intuitions of God, what accounts for the unen... Free Essays on Philoshoy Free Essays on Philoshoy Final Paper People have come to believe that we are morally responsible for our actions. We live in an increasingly violent world; a world that places individual’s responsible for the way in which they live. Our societies have founded governments, justice systems, and social contracts under the premise that people are morally responsible for their actions. Each facet of life seems to carry some sort of rule or law that enforce and asserts responsibility to that person. No mater the amount of rules and laws implemented, humans are unsuccessful in producing a society that is harmonious. A concept that contradicts and raises many questions of harmony is given through a German Philosopher G.W. Liebniz. Leibniz suggests that there is a certain structure to the way we live. He describes life as being a pre-established harmony. According to Leibniz’s theory of a pre-established harmony, humans are not responsible for their actions; instead God arranges everyone’s actions. God has the power to influence the world to his desires and wills, however it leaves humans with little moral responsibility for their actions. The lack of human responsibility is evident throughout Liebniz’s works. If everything happens because God wanted it to take place what explains the violence and destruction that we endure everyday. Through religions we have learned to attribute the success and happiness of an individual as being a work of God. On the other hand, who is responsible for unpleasant and often sad events that take place? Who is morally responsible for the imperfections of the world, God or humans? There cannot be harmony in a world where we cannot determine who retains responsibility for what happens. Traditional views uphold God as the author or cause of everything in the world. God is regarded as the creative source of everything. If all, which exists, is caused and comes into existence by the intuitions of God, what accounts for the unen...

EMBA 560 Executive position week 3 discussion 3 Research Paper

EMBA 560 Executive position week 3 discussion 3 - Research Paper Example The truth is that all businesses will eventually have to face change, and it is a wise and prudent ship’s captain who knows when to cut loose change course. A company which once commanded industry leadership around the world recently declared bankruptcy largely as a result of failure to adapt strategies to the changing environment, or by adapting change too late. The company is Kodak, formerly the world’s leading name in photography equipment and services. Kodak made its business on film photography, and when the first digital camera was invented in 1975 and was first brought to Kodak, the management considered it â€Å"cute† but insignificant because it was filmless (Mui, 2012). The company executives failed to see that the new invention was potentially disruptive and that the company must grab the opportunity of becoming a first comer and laying stakes on the new technology. Had Kodak not stuck solely to film photography in which it had dominated, and made its shift early by buying the rights to the new invention, the company would have been at the forefront of digital photography and imaging at present, instead of filing for bankruptcy protection. The problem with Kodak and the many other businesses that failed due to a misspecification in their strategy is that they are unable to recognize significant environmental shifts and to adjust accordingly to the opportunities brought about by change. Mui, C 2012 â€Å"How Kodak Failed.† Forbes. 18 Jan 2012. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/chunkamui/2012/01/18/how-kodak-failed/ 2. Consider the industry where you are currently employed (or the one you would choose to work in if currently unemployed). How does a firm in your industry create competitive advantage in the marketplace? The firms in our industry generally acquire competitive advantage in three ways: by coming up with new innovations; by improving services to the customers; or by lowering prices significantly. The firs t is the best way, where possible, because the medical devices industry is highly technology driven, and new technologies that help save and improve lives will always have strong first-comer advantages. The problem with this choice of competitive strategy is that it is capital intensive because of the extremely high investment in research and development that it requires. Companies which do not have the financial size and strength to weather long periods of product development from laboratory to market is not going to survive this type of an industry. The other firms which cannot quite undertake their own innovations will have to compete on the basis of customer service and/or low price. The giving of deep discounts on good quality products is never a good idea, because it does not properly reward the R&D proponent and may become a demotivator for the research and development of new products. In order to maintain the value of a good product even during tight competition, firms have turned to improved customer management. This is ideal because when the company establishes a long-term relationship with a client that has the prospect of repeated transactions, particularly for institutions and physicians and in the case of patients for the prospect of upgrades, then keeping detailed information on them will help the company target those products that will serve their specific purposes better. That is a value-enhancing service that the company can